Advertisement

Responsive Advertisement

Steel vs RCC structure


 

Note: This blog post is subjected to updates in case of any changes needed to be done. 

Steel structure vs RCC structure

 

Analysis areas

RCC structure

Steel structure

Construction time

Takes usually months to year

Takes lesser time, usually some months

Load bearing capacity

Unpredictable load bearing capacity and requires intermediate supports for larger spans.

Good capacity, measurable and controllable as it is pre-designed. It can cover larger spans without need of intermediate columns.

Durability

Very durable without tedious maintenance requirement.

Quite durable except for the issue of corrosion.

Availability

Readily and widely available

Lesser available

Cross-section

Requires large cross-sections

Comparatively less cross-section

Strength to weight ratio

Lesser

Higher among all civil engineering materials

Uniformity

Unpredictable uniformity at site and FOS is taken greater.

More uniform and FOS is taken lesser

Labour

Both skilled and unskilled manpower

Needs skilled manpower

Connections

None

Bolts, welding, riveting

Types of cross sections

Can be moulded into desired shape

Not possible due to pre-designed mechanism

Temperature resistance

Good choice even for large temperature difference

Usually a bad choice due to corrosive nature but can be fixed with proper technical detailing and paints

Failure

Usually brittle

Usually ductile

Heaviness for same load

Building is heavy

Building becomes lighter (about 25-40%)

Repair and expansion

Not that easy

It is easier

Usage

Less in high rise buildings.

Earth and water retaining structures.

More in high rise building such as sky scrapers.

Malls, Multiplex, offices

Tensile strength

Less

More

Elasticity

Rebars play the role

High

Life span

Min. 40-50 years but can go 100+ when properly cared

50-100 years if properly maintained.

Need of technical knowledge

Easy and simple process

Highly technical.

Fire proof

Totally fire proof

Not resistant unless protected.

Wind and earthquake

Less resistant although properly detailed structure also performs well

More resistant

Demolishment or destruction

Unusual, sudden and hazardous

Failure not sudden

Reuse

Can neither be reused nor be transferred from place to place

Reusable and transferrable

Scrap value

Not available

Available

Scope

Better choice for permanency and long term use.

Better choice for short term, transferrable and quick work outs.

Maintenance due to environmental issues

Less needed

More care needed

Design flexibility

Design can be executed on basis of demand

Only commercially available design can be used.

However, combinations of sections can also be used to generate desired shapes.

 

 

Resources concerned:

1. https://youtu.be/T4u26HFc3uE?si=1xFjBlygyCXSvW_r

2. https://youtu.be/Qk9KwPdNILg?si=qhJfujYahs5RRxAH

3. https://www.youtube.com/live/mq3W0PrG1XY?si=pZmxnznMtjRQMdoV 

4. https://youtu.be/_JMtIkNkzbk?si=5eEo5LSIUOBv4Koi

5. https://youtu.be/5qVZs-cw9Iw?si=uM8RZmslQk0JOpKM

6. https://youtu.be/UE7VMzRltk4?si=hjLNEg-0XDXLV0VS


Post a Comment

0 Comments