Note: This blog post is subjected to updates in case of any changes needed to be done.
Steel structure vs RCC structure
|
Analysis areas |
RCC structure |
Steel structure |
|
Construction time |
Takes usually months to year |
Takes lesser time, usually some months |
|
Load bearing capacity |
Unpredictable load bearing capacity and
requires intermediate supports for larger spans. |
Good capacity, measurable and
controllable as it is pre-designed. It can cover larger spans without need of
intermediate columns. |
|
Durability |
Very durable without tedious maintenance
requirement. |
Quite durable except for the issue of
corrosion. |
|
Availability |
Readily and widely available |
Lesser available |
|
Cross-section |
Requires large cross-sections |
Comparatively less cross-section |
|
Strength to weight ratio |
Lesser |
Higher among all civil engineering
materials |
|
Uniformity |
Unpredictable uniformity at site and
FOS is taken greater. |
More uniform and FOS is taken lesser |
|
Labour |
Both skilled and unskilled manpower |
Needs skilled manpower |
|
Connections |
None |
Bolts, welding, riveting |
|
Types of cross sections |
Can be moulded into desired shape |
Not possible due to pre-designed
mechanism |
|
Temperature resistance |
Good choice even for large temperature
difference |
Usually a bad choice due to corrosive nature
but can be fixed with proper technical detailing and paints |
|
Failure |
Usually brittle |
Usually ductile |
|
Heaviness for same load |
Building is heavy |
Building becomes lighter (about 25-40%) |
|
Repair and expansion |
Not that easy |
It is easier |
|
Usage |
Less in high rise buildings. Earth and water retaining structures. |
More in high rise building such as sky
scrapers. Malls, Multiplex, offices |
|
Tensile strength |
Less |
More |
|
Elasticity |
Rebars play the role |
High |
|
Life span |
Min. 40-50 years but can go 100+ when
properly cared |
50-100 years if properly maintained. |
|
Need of technical knowledge |
Easy and simple process |
Highly technical. |
|
Fire proof |
Totally fire proof |
Not resistant unless protected. |
|
Wind and earthquake |
Less resistant although properly
detailed structure also performs well |
More resistant |
|
Demolishment or destruction |
Unusual, sudden and hazardous |
Failure not sudden |
|
Reuse |
Can neither be reused nor be
transferred from place to place |
Reusable and transferrable |
|
Scrap value |
Not available |
Available |
|
Scope |
Better choice for permanency and long
term use. |
Better choice for short term, transferrable
and quick work outs. |
|
Maintenance due to environmental issues |
Less needed |
More care needed |
|
Design flexibility |
Design can be executed on basis of
demand |
Only commercially available design can
be used. However, combinations of sections can
also be used to generate desired shapes. |
Resources concerned:
1. https://youtu.be/T4u26HFc3uE?si=1xFjBlygyCXSvW_r
2. https://youtu.be/Qk9KwPdNILg?si=qhJfujYahs5RRxAH
3. https://www.youtube.com/live/mq3W0PrG1XY?si=pZmxnznMtjRQMdoV
4. https://youtu.be/_JMtIkNkzbk?si=5eEo5LSIUOBv4Koi
5. https://youtu.be/5qVZs-cw9Iw?si=uM8RZmslQk0JOpKM
6. https://youtu.be/UE7VMzRltk4?si=hjLNEg-0XDXLV0VS
0 Comments